By Robert Sweeney
Despite
Chinese claims to Tibet and a desire for Tibetan resources, China's fear of
foreign powers and its stability fuels the struggle between Tibet and China.
The earliest interactions between Tibet and China occurred in the 7th
century during which Tibet was a considerably powerful force, being able to
conquer the Chinese city, Chang' an. (Han 2). After a brief struggle
between the two powers, both powers signed a treaty which stated, "'...the
whole region to the east of Daduhe is the country of Great China and the whole
region to the west of Daduhe is surely the country of Great Tibet.'" (Han
2). This treaty affirms China's acknowledgement of Tibet as independent.
In addition, the Dalai Lama has stated, "Tibetans are seeking enough
autonomy for Tibet to allow its culture to survive, rather than outright
independence.". (Tibetans 1). If China merely wanted Tibet for economic
exploitation, they could easily exploit Tibet while still granting them
autonomy, appeasing Tibetans.
Despite
the fact that China actually acknowledged Tibet as independent and Tibet could
be appeased and exploited simultaneously, China continues to pursue the
struggle out of fear and insecurity. China was a massive political power
throughout history, until the early 1800s. Once England began to exert
its influence in China, China's power diminished dramatically. Thus, China was
exploited by England during and after the opium wars and later by Japan during
World War II. (Stokes 3). After a century of exploitation, China regained
power and Tibet's resistance of China is viewed as a potential danger to that
power. Thus, China desires complete subordination of Tibet to display its
power to other nations.
While
China claims Tibet as Chinese territory and uses Tibet for its natural
resources, the struggle between Tibet and China stem from China's insecurities
and fear of invasion. A treaty signed by China and Tibet in the 8th
century recognizes Tibet as independent from China. In addition, Tibet
has declared it only desires autonomy, which China could use to justify its
exploitation of Tibetan resources. Both these circumstances support
Tibetan autonomy, yet China continues the struggle. China suffered severe
humiliation and exploitation by foreign powers and now that it has reclaimed
power, Tibet's resistance challenges China's power. Thus, China refuses to
acknowledge Tibet as an independent nation out of fear of being exploited by
foreign powers.
Han, I. A Study
of Tibetan-Chinese Political Relations 1950-2008. Web. 29 Apr. 2012. <http://total05.enetworks.jp/assets/files/d-kiyou/01-han.pdf>.
Stokes, Dustin. "Conflict over Tibet: Core Causes and Possible Solutions." Diss. University of Colorado, 2010. Beyond Intractability. The Beyond Intractability Project, 2010. Web. 29 Apr. 2012. <http://beyondintractability.colorado.edu/case_studies/conflict_over_tibet.jsp?nid=6830.
Tibetans Not for Outright Independence from China: Dalai Lama." The Times of India. 29 Apr. 2012. Web. 29 Apr. 2012. <http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/rest-of-world/Tibetans-not-for-outright-independence-from-China-Dalai-Lama/articleshow/12918084.cms>.
Stokes, Dustin. "Conflict over Tibet: Core Causes and Possible Solutions." Diss. University of Colorado, 2010. Beyond Intractability. The Beyond Intractability Project, 2010. Web. 29 Apr. 2012. <http://beyondintractability.colorado.edu/case_studies/conflict_over_tibet.jsp?nid=6830.
Tibetans Not for Outright Independence from China: Dalai Lama." The Times of India. 29 Apr. 2012. Web. 29 Apr. 2012. <http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/rest-of-world/Tibetans-not-for-outright-independence-from-China-Dalai-Lama/articleshow/12918084.cms>.